News:
A group of intrepid CNN.com interns has called every congressional office on Capitol Hill to ask for the release of information on the money requests they've had inserted into the 12 annual spending bills. Thus far, 45 members of Congress have turned over information on their earmark requests.
JUST THE FACTS !!!! OH MY GOD !! SCUMMMMMM
http://www.airamerica.com/node/4137#comment-208928
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 22, 2007 - 7:19pmMore info
It's even more telling to see that of those NOT turning their earmark requests over, the majority simply never responded to the request. By the interns' count, 316 ignored the request, 68 refused to turn anything over, and six said they didn't submit any earmarks.
I checked my local districts as an example. One refused, four others didn't respond.
Is it going to take FOIA requests to get this stuff out in the open? If so, they'd better get underway NOW, before the '08 election cycle really starts kicking in. Who knows...maybe the American people have a chance to regain control of at least a third of the government!
For the ordinary American, the price of "New Democracy" in other countries is the death of real democracy at home. ~~~Arundhati Roy
- Email this page
By nonexistent manJune 22, 2007 - 9:18pmWe're cool with my Reps earmark requests
Bushco diverted our town's timber revenue
supplement funds, and sent them to Iraq,
and to his other offshore foreign projects.
All the local county services, including school
funds, are drying up. Police are being laid off.
(I won't say where, I don't want to inform
prospective burglers and meth lab types.
Landowners don't want to carry the load in
excessive property taxes. So no one knows what
will happen. We play it by day.
Our Reps were trying to buy us some time.
Not all earmarks are pork.
Bush cut into muscle.
I guess hard working people without jobs should
count their blessings. I guess every yard in
town will have a 'For Sale' sign on it. Then the
values will come down. And bushco will cleanup on
all the foreclosure deals. Nice racket that
'fleecing of America' is.
This government is run by 301,139,947* rulers
who can rightfully claim:
This is MY government
*latest U.S. population estimate:
http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html 2
- Email this page
By aaazzz111June 22, 2007 - 11:20pmby aaazzz111 on 6/22/07-10:20pm
He's trying to strong-arm the areas' leadership to relax environmental protections. Didn't I just read recently that approval has been given to open up more old growth areas for harvest?
(an aside; I just finished a pretty long stretch of work at the Hynix plant, and stayed down there near the campus. Loved Eugene. 'The Jail' has the BEST teriaki!)
01-20-09
- Email this page
By roadgoddessJune 23, 2007 - 7:46amIf I remember correctly I
I think he tried, or did, and was over turned, opened the Tsongas National Forest in Alaska. A nice little pay back for decades of campaign funding, and we all have heard of ANWAR, and the 25 years of constant begging and politicial trickery at opening up the last sancuary on earth for a few spits of oil. Funny how the right cannot for the life of their children see the facts of ANWAR, Yucca Mt., Tsongas Forest, old growth and fire retention management.
What is it with that simplicity?
Bas
- Email this page
By BastiatJune 24, 2007 - 8:57amby Basstiat on 06/24/07-7:57am
"What is it with that simplicity?"
Hard to wrap a greedy mind-set around.
01-20-09
- Email this page
By roadgoddessJune 24, 2007 - 9:22amjust a thoought
I have not looked it up but in my city our councel members are each given a certain amount of money for their districts.to be used for special projects . If congress does not do this already . I would be all for it if they did.
- Email this page
By getmad54June 22, 2007 - 11:43pmI am mad too, but
I have not looked it up but in my city our councel members are each given a certain amount of money for their districts.to be used for special projects .
I am mad too, but don't you think that all the taxes you pay should actually already go to projects, and programs that have already been approved by all americans before? Like Social Security.
Federal budget 2008, has $280+ Billlion dollars in borrowing from the Social Security Trust fund for projects like new nuclear weapons and cash payments for Halliburton in Iraq. Do we like that or can we live with that? I don't think so. What's your rep doing about that?
I know mine will NOT answer the question.
Bas
- Email this page
By BastiatJune 24, 2007 - 9:02amok i looked it up
But first I believe that social security trust fund should never have been touched for any reason but for its true purpose.WE can thank reagan for breaking that unwritten law .And i also agree that congress should tell us what earmarks are used for.So is it pork or a earmark,Article 1,section 9 clause 7 each member can request for consideration for specific programs,agencies and federal needs.For district,state,and the united states,this money comes from when they finnish with the budget.Also mine did not answer that question.And that is not right.
- Email this page
By getmad54June 24, 2007 - 2:15pmAnd ever since, and before, Raygun opened up that money
out of his shear hate for entightelment programs and welfare, other wise known as helping those who need help, SSDI, the Democrats have had plenty of blame at spending that money like a whore.
A Short Story.
The Sad Story of Our Social Security Program
Many years ago in Seattle, two wonderful neighbors, Elliott and Patty
Roosevelt came to my home to swim on a regular basis. They were a great
couple full of laughter and stories that today I continue to marvel at. Both
are now deceased, but their stories remain.
During the years of our friendship we had many, many discussions about
Elliott's parents (President Franklin D. and Eleanor Roosevelt) and how his
father and mother never intended for the Social Security and Welfare
programs to turn out the way they are today. Elliott used to say that if
his parents returned to earth and saw what the politicians had done to their
programs they would have burned all of them in hell.
Here is a story I received today regarding the Social Security Program and I
immediately thought of Elliott's comments. I Hope you will read this and
think about it.
Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA)
Program. He promised:
1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary,
2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of
their annual incomes into the Program,
3) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be
deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,
4.) That the money the participants put into the independent "Trust Fund"
rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would only be
used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government
program, and,
5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as
income.
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a
Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting
taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to "put away" you may be interested in the following:
Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent "Trust
Fund" and put it into the General fund so that Congress could spend it?
A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the Democratically controlled House and Senate.
Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social
Security (FICA) withholding?
A: The Democratic Party.
Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?
A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the "tie-breaking" deciding
vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US.
Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to
immigrants? AND MY FAVORITE:
A: That's right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved
into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments!
The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never
paid a dime into it!
Then, after doing all this lying and thieving and violating of the original
contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans
want to take your Social Security away!
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!
If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.
I'm not even close, but I remember dedecting my FICA payments from my iincome tax. Never since and now my mom pays taxes on her benefits that she receives. Wow. What a moral and great country. Thanks a lot.
Bas
- Email this page
By BastiatJune 25, 2007 - 9:17amMore GOPedophilia
Rudy The Rapist
It takes a village to have an idiot - Actor212
- Email this page
By actor212June 23, 2007 - 6:14amAHHHHHHH,, I NEEDED THAT !!!
http://www.weather.com/aboutus/television/ocms/mitchell.html
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 23, 2007 - 9:21amOH YEA ,,,
RIGHT TARDS BLOW. ((UP THE INNOCENT ))
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 23, 2007 - 9:22amHAD TO BE POLITICAL,
ITS THE VENUE.
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 23, 2007 - 9:22amQUICK QUESTION ,,,
GOT FAITH ? LAST TIME I ASKED THAT ON THE NET ,FAITH HILL THOUGHT SHE WON THE AWARD. WHAT ARE THE ODDS.HAD A DREAM LAST NIGHT . THERE WAS A BULLY PICKING ON A CROWED AND I WENT TO HIM AND DISTRACTED HIM .THE NEXT THING WAS A FLOODED SWAMP .THE HOSE BIB WAS LEFT ON TO LONG . FUNNY HUH?
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 23, 2007 - 10:20amu r a spam whore!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is it time to rapture these fake christians yet?
- Email this page
By shlogerJune 23, 2007 - 10:31amOOOH BABY BABY ,UH HUH UH HUH.
HAY DID YOU SEE NASA HAD PROBLEMS ? IT WAS LIKE GOD WAS THROWING ONE LOB BALL AFTER ANOTHER .RAIN RAIN RAIN ./////////// verb, lobbed, lob·bing, noun
–verb (used with object) 1. Tennis. to hit (a ball) in a high arc to the back of the opponent's court.
2. to fire (a missile, as a shell) in a high trajectory so that it drops onto a target.
3. Cricket. to bowl (the ball) with a slow underhand motion.
4. to throw (something) slowly in an arc.
–verb (used without object) 5. Tennis. to lob a ball.
–noun 6. Tennis. a ball hit in a high arc to the back of the opponent's court.
7. Cricket. a ball bowled with a slow underhand motion.
8. British Dialect. a slow, heavy, dull-witted person.
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 23, 2007 - 11:24amWhat a bunch of hooey
So if you have problems, it's like God is throwing lob balls at you? When it rains on you, it's Divine punishment?
- Email this page
By MichtouJune 23, 2007 - 11:38amITS ALL A BLESSING
C
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 23, 2007 - 5:01pmJust a thought...
...but it seems to me that someone has written a piece of code like this to randomly post gibberish onto the board. After all, this site doesn't ask for a 'Captcha' to prevent a computer programmer from taking advantage of the simple comment/reply/ nature of the site to automatically enter semi-sensical responses.
Of course, they make slightly more sense than the outright lies (followed by "that's a known fact") we're used to from the Freeper contingent in here. I'm not entirely sure why they've taken to posting the same way that Dwight from "The Office" would talk either ("Fact, beets beat bears..."). Maybe to someone that lives in their parents' basement, he'd be their hero.
-----------------------
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.
-Daniel P. Moynihan
- Email this page
By ShawnGBRJune 25, 2007 - 3:48pmActually
I just looked. There IS a module available to add captchas. I'm not sure if the AAR Webmaster isn't aware of its existence, or just hasn't gotten around to adding it yet.
*nudges Webmaster gently*
For the ordinary American, the price of "New Democracy" in other countries is the death of real democracy at home. ~~~Arundhati Roy
- Email this page
By nonexistent manJune 25, 2007 - 6:21pmAs annoying as captchas
As annoying as captchas might be, trolls are far more annoying. I'd be willing to sign in daily with captchas, if it would help keep the trolls from pooping all over the place.
"War is a racket. Many die. A few profit"--Gen. Smeldley Bultler
"War is delightful to those who have no experience in it."--Erasmus
"The only thing we have to fear is Bush himself."--John Eastlund
- Email this page
By MichtouJune 25, 2007 - 8:10pmSure seems like it .
.
- Email this page
By stop tellin liesJune 24, 2007 - 1:27amHow To Stop Global Warming
The Kind Of Thinking We Need Today
It takes a village to have an idiot - Actor212
- Email this page
By actor212June 24, 2007 - 7:16amSweet, people are thinking
I don't think that Idea is feasable, but if one where to start with an abandoned building and a big water tank on the top that might get past the high initial cost. Solar panels for power and HID's for lighting. It may work.
There are many new inventions for growing veggies and such thanks to the inovation of the rest of the worlds indoor marijuana growing. Sweeet.
Bas
- Email this page
By BastiatJune 24, 2007 - 9:09am"I don't think the idea is feasable,...."
Sure it is. I think it's a GREAT idea.
http://www.gdrc.org/uem/water/rainwater/introduction.html
There are many low/hi tech combos that can work in concert to facilitate this idea. Many people are 'harvesting' rainwater to off-set their water bills. Why wouldn't that work in an area that gets a fair amount of rain-fall? Couple that with solar panels for lighting, and using composting for soil/fertilizer, and...viola!
10-20-09
- Email this page
By roadgoddessJune 24, 2007 - 12:00pmI'm only slightly skeptical
I tend to look at things in a big picture. Like, why invade a country and spend a Trillion dollars when we could have just bought the dam thing? Or, if the building or "Farm Buildings" cost a billion dollars and the brocolli cost $20 a pound, whose going to buy it?
If ethanol is clean burning thats a good thing, but why don't we hear that it takes 7 barrels of oil to make 8 barrels of ethanol? etc etc.
To tell you the truth it sounds like the beginning of the building of a utopia, and I can stand behind that for sure. Theres plenty of money in the Pentagon budget for doing it in every city in the country too. The Dept of Survival. Sounds like a good replacement for the most dispicable org on the planet. Next to congress that is.
Bas
- Email this page
By BastiatJune 25, 2007 - 9:28amSince California is busily paving its prime farmland
and growing houses instead of food, it's probably a good idea to start thinking in terms of local growth.
I live in a fairly agricultural area. If worse came to worst, I could buy locally grown foods, but it would be a slim picking: strawberries, broccoli, grapes and avocados.
"War is a racket. Many die. A few profit"--Gen. Smeldley Bultler
"War is delightful to those who have no experience in it."--Erasmus
"The only thing we have to fear is Bush himself."--John Eastlund
- Email this page
By MichtouJune 24, 2007 - 11:23am