Is that code for triple-lefty?

If you don't like Obama, go vote for McSame.

Clinton lost. Get over it. One can win delegates in either primaries or caucuses (in some states like Texas, you can win them in both or either). The simple fact is Team Clinton did not have a long-haul plan; they expected to have the nomination sewn up in their favor by Super Tuesday. If she does such a poor job planning her campaign, what makes you think she'd be a better president than Obama?

I must give Hillary credit however. Her speech to the convention was an out-of-the-park home run (as was Obama's), and she earned back some of my respect for her donning of the team colors. I almost forgive her for her statements that claimed that McSame was qualified to be president and Obama wasn't. Since 74 is the new 60, I guess Hillary will have a good chance to succeed Obama in 2016.

...watch McCain's eyes at the vp announcement see how they wonder up and down!

1. Thats in her favor.
2. Oil is a large source of income and jobs in her state. That does not mean she is "in the oil companies pocket.
3. See one.
4. Another point in her favor. And how you jump from being against the mass slaughter of unborn children to gun control is totally absurd.
5. See one
6. So, your a racist. You judge people by the color of their skin, rather than the content of their minds and character.
7. See one
8. She is not against social programs. She against federaly mandated social programs.
9. See one.
10. See one
11. See one
12.She reads the same bible and holds the same religeous beliefs as Obama.
13. See one
14.See 12.
15. See one

Yep and it's the same guy behind both. He's the author of McCain's Georgian policy.

Karl was against it , before he was for it

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/08/29/vp-picks-karl-rove-swings-and-m...

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/29/rove-plain-ready/

Graduating summa cum laude (if I remember correctly) from Harvard Law School and being editor of Harvard Law Review are amazing accomplishments, which proves that Obama has a top-rate intellect. Having such an intellect indicates that he's probably a quick study, who would learn what it takes to be a good President - if he had an open mind and appreciated the lessons of history.

But like many smart people before him, he has neither attribute. Instead, he's a close-minded leftist, who has THE most liberal voting record in the Senate (more left than Bernie Sanders, the socialist Senator from Vermont), which shows he's never reached across the isle and brought people with differing views together, as he claims he'll do as President; he'll return to the big government spending programs of the 1960's, which failed at diminishing poverty and became, instead, wasteful and bureaucratic drags on the economy, and, therefore, had to be slowly dismantled, starting in the 1980's; he'll return to the policing/diplomatic emphasis of the 1990's to control terrorism, which resulted in 1993 WTC attack, the 1996 Khobar Towers attack, the 1998 African embassies bombings, the 1999 U.S.S. Cole bombing, and the 2001 WTC attack (since that time, using all means, including the military one, we've had no such attacks in the same almost 8 year period); discarding the lessons of WWII, when the allies appeased Hitler, a decision that spurred a war, in which 50,000,000 died, Obama would emphasize "talking" to such people, which only use such "talks" as a delaying action and method of war to gain what they want, if said talks aren't supported by the credible threat of military force. Had we used this approach with Saddam, he'd still be in power now with the sanctions gone, his WMD stockpiles back, his interaction and training of terrorists (including Al Qaeda) ongoing, and Saddam's prestige among the Arabs high - for having defied and beaten the west.

On the domestic front, he's a staunch supporter of abortion "rights," even though science is irrefutable in that what's being killed is human, based on DNA and the developmental continuum, which is common to all human beings, no matter how young; he voted against the "Born Alive Act," which prevents survivors of botched abortions from being killed, even if they're outside the womb and are clearly born (an extremely monstrous, savage, and uncivilized practice similar to the sort of barbarity practiced by the Nazis); and, of course, his support for gay marriage (given his opposition to ballot measures outlawing it and his stated intent of getting rid of DOMA), despite irrefutable medical and psychological evidence, proving how this behavior is as unhealthy as smoking.

Also, who can forget how Obama, despite his intelligence, is a notoriously poor judge of people, which is disastrous, if you want to be POTUS. As examples we have the acerbic, hateful, and bigoted, Jeremiah Wright; the convicted felon, Tony Rezko; and the unreptentent terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

So yes, Obama's a very smart man, but he's definitely not a wise man. To be POTUS, you have to have both attributes. In this regard, Obama's most definitely two pancakes short of a full stack.