The Obama Imprint

Obama's imprint goes something like this: defeat racism by ignoring it. Obama has defanged racism by neglect.
And accordingly, there's going to be tremendous pressure within the black community to question this newfound freedom. Already, today's black leaders are cautious and quick to remind Americans that Obama won the presidency because of the debt paid by many years of struggle.
Cornel West says in an interview with the Miami Herald:
"Our agenda still requires a highlighting of the disproportion of suffering and misery of black people... We are going to have to put pressure on to let him know we are part of his public interest, too...I will speak and I will organize and I will mobilize and be part of pressure groups seeking justice for black folks, but never stopping there."
Michael Eric Dyson writes in the LA Times:
"We should not be seduced by the notion that Obama's presidency signals the end of racism, the civil rights movement, the struggle for black equality or the careers of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton."
While to many degrees these assertions are accurate, West and Dyson's statements hide another idea. And it is this: This is a game changer. And this is not a changer about a "post-racial" or "post-racist" America; this is a changer about the way blacks operate and view themselves.
What Obama has done is so extraordinary that it calls into question the entire project of black advocates and intellectuals preoccupied by the question of racism (reveal it, explain it, shame it). What Dyson later refers to (in the link above) as the "incalculable psychic boost" of youngsters growing up seeing Obama, is a whole lot more than that. This is not about getting boosted but rather about finding a tactic that works.
More specifically and for example, there are two sides of being a victim: the wronged side and the side of insight. If insight is the
transcendent side, then the victim side is the side that has not been transformed, gotten over, accepted the wrong or whatever the negative was. Obama's imprint is on the side of insight. It's a stark choice. One stays in jail, the other has stepped out.
There are competing agendas of course. Black leaders want to retain their relevance and platform. This however disempowers the individual who is told that he is up against a society working against him. It de-emphasizes his ability to change events, to mold the world to his will. This is the Obama imprint.
A New York City teen I know, grew up tough (his mother was brutal and abusive); he got his girlfriend pregnant and is now struggling to support her and his child working two jobs. The Obama victory was an amazing event to him. The old black leader might counsel this teenager: You see Obama, he's special; what's he going to do for you? He owes you something. But the Obama imprint, or what I might say to this boy-man is this: Now despite everything you have been through, everything you have endured and done, now you have proof that anything is possible. There is a huge gap between here and where you want to be (if you can bear the thought of hoping for more for yourself) but you alone must cover it. Nothing
can stop you.
This is freedom. And it's quite frightening. But it's a whole lot better that being a slave. Slavery seems like such an antiquated term and yet freedom and slavery are really what I am talking about. And this is not to diminish the black the experience. I mean actually to highlight that blacks have a lot of information to share about strength, endurance and beauty. But
the depth of our understanding (and mercy) is just beginning to show itself. Our self-pity, sadness or anger over what West calls
"suffering", however real, is actually an obstacle.
Even the black literary giants will have to make a new literature for our updated situation. We've spent a lot of time going over and over and over the wounds -- like a fly stuck in a box. I don't think any of us expected this quick turn in our story. A recent review of Toni Morrison's latest novel, A Mercy senses this shortcoming:
This author's early novels were breakthroughs into the experience of black Americans as refracted in the poetic and indignant perceptions of a black woman from Lorain, Ohio; as Morrison moves deeper into a more visionary realism, a betranced pessimism saps her plots of the urgency that hope imparts to human adventures...Varied and authoritative and frequently beautiful though the language is, it circles around a vision, both turgid and static, of a new world turning old, and poisoned from the start.
And, the limits of our religious traditions will be tested too, the old time religion that taught blacks to wait for 'the kingdom' or a
better time. What if the better time is now? It's now. Blacks have to rethink the place of preachers who advocate justice but not the rights of gays. Blacks have to come to terms with the gap between what they know intuitively about faith and God and what has become culturally acceptable to think, value or believe. This is the struggle of the larger culture as well, but blacks know better, if they can learn the lesson (transform the experience) of being victimized.
But for all this collective talk, let's face it, blacks are individuals. By history and fate blacks are loners, a tribe of mavericks and rogues. Now, my wish for that teenager is for him to know that wherever he finds himself, that's where a leader is.
Originally posted on the Huffington Post
- FILED UNDER: Editor Posts
- November 15, 2008








I disagree. Obama didn't
I disagree. Obama didn't neglect racism, he addressed it head on in his speech about race. And what he told people made them realize they didn't have to be afraid of having a black man lead the country, that he was going to be a leader for everyone, regardless of their color. He reassured people that thought he would only deal with black problems, that he would deal with their problems too.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 16, 2008 - 12:33amI agree
I agree. I think he addressed racism as much as he should have during his campaign. I think it would have been a mistake to make it more of an issue. I hope that a bunch of black people don't come out and create problems for Barack, acting as if he is supposed to be the President of Black America. I've said this before and I'll say it again. Black people need to stop looking for a leader and lead themselves. They can do this by self education, and seeking out the resources needed to become financially stable. We can no longer waist time being the victim and looking for help. We can help ourselves. The only person you can count on is yourself. We as black people have to be accountable and we should hold each other accountable for our own actions.
- Email this page
By AlderanNovember 16, 2008 - 8:23pmI Think Obama should address the racism that
permeates this site. Don't you, Michatou?
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 12:36amDid you say something?
*looks*
Nope. I didn't think so.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 16, 2008 - 3:05amHi Again, Dummy!
Gee, momofuklansman!
If you and BeBe and ITSO/Johnny Galt and frogglodyte left the site, there would be no racism permeating this site!
You've been banned multiple times, yet you continue to spout your idiocy. You just crave attention to compensate for your low self esteem issues. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Bye, Dummy!
- Email this page
By othelloNovember 16, 2008 - 10:31amYou really make the most absurd statements ever made.
Racism is a democratic party institution. Saying differently doesn't change that fact. Its just now you people have decided to hate another color. By the way, I am not white, so how can I be racists? Please explain your absurdities for the entire class to see. By the way, race based politics is racism.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:07pmYou are in a state of deep
You are in a state of deep denial. Your selective interpretation of history proves it. The KKK was started as a social club by ex-Confederate soldiers. They became Democrats simply because they refused to be part of the party of Lincoln. It had nothing to do with Democratic ideology. That they terrorized people as Democrats doesn't mean that Democrats were the party of racism.
When the second KKK came around, they were already more like the Republican party: they were anti-Jewish, anti-Catholic, anti-Union, and anti-Communist. You can't tell me that they were Democratic anymore. Yes, they had moved North, and spread out over the country, but they were no longer the KKK of the South either. It was no longer an organizations with only Democratic membership. It was increasing ethnocentric, isolationist, conservative, and phobic of change in the country.
The current KKK is not a national group. It's a bunch of local groups with similar ideas. They are right-wing neo-nazis.
The South was never really Democratic (in terms of supporting Democratic platforms), although it voted that way. It was because of historical resentment for what Lincoln had done. It switched allegiance to the Republican party when it became obvious that the Democrats were going to support civil rights for black people. The Republicans were split. Yes, the Republicans helped passed civil rights legislation, but they certainly didn't spearhead it and they weren't one hundred percent behind it. It was during the civil rights era that the South became Republican, because their main concern was to keep blacks down and they could see Democrats were against that.
You can ignore and re-write history all you want, but you just make yourself look foolish to keep insisting on it. You keep trying to make the Democrats out to be the racist party, but the Republicans only had ONE shining moment in history. They gave it up a long, long time ago, and became exactly what they fought against.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 16, 2008 - 5:23pmthis is where you are wrong
The KKK was strong in the south. The democractic party was strong in the south. They voted for the democratic platform. The northern democrats supported the southern democrats, to stay in power. If they had not, there would have been no jim crow laws enacted, no segregation, no racial tensions, lynchings, etc. For the sake of power, the democratic party looked the other way, while a part of their party did these evil deeds. That is the historical facts.
By the way, it was Eisenhower who first sent troops into the south to enforce integration/civil rights. It was Eisenhower who first proposed the civil rights act, which Kennedy voted against. Don't try and re-write history. The republican party was at the forefront of civil rights. The democrats co-oped it from them, just as Clinton stole parts of Newts contract with America, and claimed it for himself..
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 6:25pmhttp://www.presidency.ucsb.ed
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25891
Eisenhower was an honorable man. He wasn't the whole party.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 16, 2008 - 7:35pmSo you agree, Kennedy opposed the civil rights bill.
Yeah yeah, I know, he had excuses to not endorse it, but, funny, you left out other votes of his, also opposing civil rights legislation. By the way, don't you find that letter a little self serving, seeing as how he was in the middle of a campaign? If he had voted for the legislation, he would have lost the election.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 7:42pmAre you still blathering about nothing?
*looks again*
Yep. You're still blathering about nothing. You'd best be careful with that. Jerry Seinfeld has the copyright.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 16, 2008 - 11:19pmSo, tell me michtou
When did the southern democrats not vote with the northern democrats? Oh, yeah, in 1964. When the northern democrats adopted the republican civil rights agenda.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 12:31amOh, little one, with a little one
you are getting more infantile with your insults as the days progress. Why don't you grow a pair or at least grow up?
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:09pmMomo,
Was you trying to say something, or was that the rocks rattling around in your head? Adios. Come back when you have something realitive to say.
FREE LEONARD PELTIER
www.aimovement.org
www.layoffinhofe.com
www.autismrocks.org
- Email this page
By rlm_dcbNovember 16, 2008 - 5:13pmwhy should anyone free leonard peltier?
So he can go out and kill again?
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 12:32amI'm not going to pretend to
I'm not going to pretend to be a student of history, I'm not. And being too young to remember (or even be alive) during the times of Kennedy, I have no memories of the time.
But lets LOOK at both parties today, and the issues they support. Raising minimum wage, universally available health care, tax cuts for the under 200k folks and discontinuing Bush's tax cuts for the rich, education, etc. It's no wonder that looking at a GOP rally looks so monochromatic.
Look at the issues the GOP is championing - one man one woman definition of marriage, supporting useless wars, keeping tax cuts for the rich, etc. None of these things benefit the majority of Americans.
-- Yes we DID!!!! --
- Email this page
By dtaylo75November 17, 2008 - 7:35amI would hope that he has
I would hope that he has better things to do than come here and address your concerns, Mr. Liberal Holocaust.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 16, 2008 - 10:58amMy concerns?
Heaven forbid that Obama should address the issue of you racists or that he should feel that it is a concern.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:11pmBy momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 12:36am
Qui vir odiosus
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 12:09pmYo, bamma biotch
you baked. Don't be such a jabronie. Yo just a jankity ol WB.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:36pmBy momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:36pm
Locked to preserve the stupidity. Let's get a troll room for hatey and his friends.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 7:39pmWow!
momofuku. I'm black and have not seen anything on this site that I thought was racist. I don't think michatou's comment is racist. By reading some of your comments I think the problem is that you're a dumbass!
- Email this page
By AlderanNovember 16, 2008 - 11:33pmmomofuku is just a troll
He's been lurking here in various guises for at least two years, and has been banned at least three times. He uses this particular sock-puppet account to accuse everyone here of racism. He uses another one to sound like a bad Boondocks episode from Cartoon Network. He's also claimed to be a member of a church in San Francisco, and claims to be recording every conversation he's involved in to show his pastor and demonstrate how evil the Progressives are.
Personally, I think he's been playing with his modem so much that his hardware's turned to software.
I really don't have a lot of sympathy for him, either, considering how disruptive he and some of the other g0p sheeple-trolls have been throughout this entire election cycle.
Want to really make him mad? Ignore him.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 16, 2008 - 11:50pmYou having fantasies of hatey again, I see
Boy, that brother really riles you people up, don't he? Oh, if only I could be as smart as him..Still, I'm twice as smart as any of you.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 12:24amDid you say something?
*looks again*
Nope. I didn't think so.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 17, 2008 - 12:44amGrown Ups
Hey, momofuku, I though this site was to promote intelligent, grown up conversation. How old are you? Now that I know your history on this site, this is my last repsonse to you. You're not worth the effort or time, brotha. lol
- Email this page
By AlderanNovember 17, 2008 - 7:40pmYeah right.
then you haven't been on this site very long. By the way, what makes you think as you do? Because I happen to believe that the democratic party is and has always been the party of racism? That they have worked very hard to keep blacks in poverty? That they only pander to the black community for votes? What exactly to you find untrue about what I believe? Exactly, how has the democratic party actually helped the black community? You really sound like a brainwashed dummy yourself.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 12:19amBy the way, I didn't say michtou's comment was racist.
But she does not condemn the racist statement she is aware of, posted by the likes of pookie, fu bush, liberallunatic, etc.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 12:22amYeah, you are demanding
Yeah, you are demanding behavior from me that you yourself do not engage in. You have yet to condemn bebeholmes and froggy, and I have yet to hear you condemn your own sockpuppet Liberal Holocaust.
You can't have it both ways. I say nothing because when things get nasty, I usually stop reading. That's right, I don't read your long back and forth insult fests with other bloggers. I don't waste my time.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 17, 2008 - 9:21amI muist have missed the posts you are referring to.
I have seen a few posts from both those (bebeholmes and froggy)individuals, but don't remember any racists remarks from them. As to liberal holocaust, I only remember two posts from that person, and I did condemn his speech. I even recommended that person be banned. Maybe it was in one of the posts you ignored. What ever. I do admit that you do try to stay civil, thought you do, at times, trade in insults, as do I. I have tried to remain civil with you, and a few others, but I see no point in ignoring every insults thrown my way. Sometimes a person has to give back what is thrown at them.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 10:05amGo throw this
You lying racist sack of shit.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000November 17, 2008 - 10:11amBy AlderanNovember 16, 2008 - 11:33pm
Non had the best advice: ignore hatey. He hates it when you do that.
His favorite tactic is to argue the democrats are racist because of the southern vote on civi rights. I shot down his arguments by proving the southern vote was a conservative vote. he southern democrats were conservative and voted with conservative republicans except for certain issues. Basically the southern democrat was too stupid to realize the changes in party politics for decades.
hatey became so enraged that he started spamming the boards with loooong spam bombs and this got him banned. O ne of several times he has been banned. Now he tries to bring the topic up again and again. That is another of hatey's ploys. He just wants to get you to waste time repeating the same arguments again and again. Ignoring him means he fails at that. He hates that.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 17, 2008 - 8:15amLet's see, now.
If you shot something down, that means you proved something. Now, class, let's let fu bush explain why the southern democrats and the northern democrats, voted consistently as a block, for over one hundred years. Just because the northern democrats finally allied themselves with the republicans, on civil rights, does not answer the question of why the democratic party used race then, and now to further its agenda. The democratic party aligns itself, historically, with whatever voting block that will keep them in power, regardless of the ideology of said block. By the way, exactly what has the democratic party actually done to improve the lot of the black community? By the way, I really don't give a good flying fuck if you respond or not. You usually only post anti-american articles, anyway. That's why you are known as the Ham of Spam.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 8:57pmLet's see, now.
If you shot something down, that means you proved something. Now, class, let's let fu bush explain why the southern democrats and the northern democrats, voted consistently as a block, for over one hundred years. Just because the northern democrats finally allied themselves with the republicans, on civil rights, does not answer the question of why the democratic party used race then, and now to further its agenda. The democratic party aligns itself, historically, with whatever voting block that will keep them in power, regardless of the ideology of said block. By the way, exactly what has the democratic party actually done to improve the lot of the black community? By the way, I really don't give a good flying fuck if you respond or not. You usually only post anti-american articles, anyway. That's why you are known as the Ham of Spam.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 8:58pmAfter this Id look up Stanhope on drugs....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxVWbERsZHs&feature=related
- Email this page
By MadgardnerNovember 16, 2008 - 6:25amI'll even throw a drug one up,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzfDtyDk9XE
- Email this page
By MadgardnerNovember 16, 2008 - 6:32amAnother weekend of news talk shows on TV
Another weekend of mostly right wing guests on the shows.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 10:21amBy f u bush2 November 16, 2008 - 10:21am
Gosh darn that librul meedyah!
____________________
No. Mo. Joe.
- Email this page
By SJerseyIndyNovember 16, 2008 - 10:50amI believe the media
is interested in the direction the Republican Party will take after the big losses in this election. Republicans, in my view, have lost their way. It is hard to find a republican anymore that believes in fiscal conservatism, smaller government, lower taxes, allowing the free markets to REALLY work and being an honorable, honest representative that does not buy into pork for their districts, States and Themselves! When republicans get back to their basics and become a true opposition party with ideas, they will compete. I do not know when this will happen.
- Email this page
By fern55November 16, 2008 - 1:39pmIt has been proven
that free markets and lower taxes do NOT work. It is "conservative" policies, dating back to 1980, that have caused this economic crisis.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000November 16, 2008 - 2:03pmFluffy
Guess who said this.
Americans have always pursued our dreams within a free market that has
been the engine of our progress. It’s a market that has created a
prosperity that is the envy of the world, and rewarded the innovators and
risk-takers who have made America a beacon of science, and technology, and
discovery. But the American economy has worked in large part because we
have guided the market’s invisible hand with a higher principle – that
America prospers when all Americans can prosper. That is why we have put
in place rules of the road to make competition fair, and open, and honest.
Or this.
I will cut taxes – cut taxes – for 95% of all working families. My
opponent doesn’t want you to know this, but under my plan, tax rates will
actually be less than they were under Ronald Reagan.
- Email this page
By richaduNovember 16, 2008 - 3:57pmLet me clarify
Cutting taxes on the wealthy has been proven not to work. Unregulated capitalism has been proven not to work.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000November 16, 2008 - 4:02pmYour clarification
still needs work. fern55 never said unregulated anything.
- Email this page
By richaduNovember 16, 2008 - 5:35pmWell, when Michael Steele becomes the head of the party
the party will have a chance to find its direction again.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:02pmI don't know who Steele is
but I wouldn't hold my breath.
- Email this page
By richaduNovember 16, 2008 - 5:43pmHe is the forme Lt. Governor of Maryland
MIAMI -- Former Maryland Lt. Gov. Michael Steele is running to be the next chairman of the Republican National Committee.
Following the GOP's sweeping losses in last week's elections, Steele said the party in recent years has failed to live up to its principles.
"The Republican Party must present a vision for the future of America that relies on our conservative values and core principles," he said. "It is wrong to believe the voters have suddenly become liberal. They have just lost any sense of confidence that the Republican Party holds the answers to their problems."
Steele was state chairman of the Maryland Republican Party from 2000 to 2002. He was the state's lieutenant governor from 2003-2007, becoming the first black candidate ever elected to a statewide position there. In November 2006, he lost a bid for the U.S. Senate.
"Most Americans today see a Republican Party that defines itself by what it is against rather than what it is for," Steele said in announcing his candidacy Thursday in Miami, where the Republican Governors Association is meeting. "We can tell you why public schools aren't working but not articulate a compelling vision for how we'll better educate children. We're well equipped to rail against tax increases but can't begin to explain how we'll help the poor."
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 6:03pmBy momofuku November 16, 2008 - 6:03pm
Actually, Michael Steele is a lying sack of shit Republican...
...who tries to mislead voters into thinking he is a Democrat, so he can get more votes. If he's the new leader of your party, you're in trouble.
- Email this page
By ExpatinEUNovember 17, 2008 - 2:03pmBy momofuku November 16, 2008 - 5:02pm
Well, when Michael Steele becomes the head of the party
the party will have a chance to find its direction again.
---------------------------
:lol:
Take this as free, much needed advice:
your pa(R)ty needs to head in the opposite direction Failville...
____________________
No. Mo. Joe.
- Email this page
By SJerseyIndyNovember 17, 2008 - 10:20amSo, we are talking about the heading up the Republican party.
Steele was the only black man in history to ever win elective office in that state, which traditionally votes democratic. He will be a breath of fresh air for the republican's.
by Michael Steel
“I think the other thing that I’ve found that’s been lacking over the last four years, especially the last two cycles–’06 and ’08—we don’t know how to talk to people. We’ve absolutely forgotten how to communicate a message … to espouse those principles in the context of people’s everyday lives. … Our party needs to have a voice, it needs to have a relevant voice that people can identify with.”
“We put $700 billion on the table that we didn’t have. We’re now trying to carve out an extra $300 billion to put on the table. My question is, when does it stop? You don’t want to keep feeding this trough here that people on the Hill seem to want to be at.
“To the Republicans in the House and in the Senate, over this lame duck session you can be against a whole lot of things but you better start to be about something and for something, as well. Out party can’t just be in a position where we’re sitting back going ‘no to this, no to that, no to that’ without any explanation, number one, and without some alternative proposal to put on the table.”
“I bring a different experience to the table. I was a grassroots guy from day one. I started out here in my hometown of DC working the streets and knocking on doors. I then worked the central committee in Maryland, Prince George’s County. Became chairman of the party there for six years. State chairman. An elected official and lieutenant governor of the State of Maryland. Now I’m chairing GOPAC, a national grassroots organization that’s geared toward training and electing Republican candidates. So I think I bring a host of different perspectives to the table. … I want to make our party relevant and I think the experience I bring to the table will help us do that. I’m tired of us sitting with our heads in the sand complaining and finger pointing. Let’s get up, pick ourselves up, go out here and engage the fight. I want to be the loyal opposition to this incoming administration.”
Steele hits the nail on the head with his warning about communications. The Republicans need to have someone who relentlessly offers positive alternatives along with rational opposition to the Democratic agenda. It’s not about being nice, but about positioning the GOP as the grown-ups while the Democratic Congress and Obama administration write one check after another.
Republicans need someone with national name recognition who can do all of that as well as reorganize the RNC, modernize its communications, and find effective candidates for Congress. The chair has to be ubiquitous, appearing everywhere and every day, making himself heard on every single issue. Only a few people already have that kind of personality, and Steele is already busily proving that he qualifies.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 9:07pmBy momofukuNovember 17, 2008 - 9:07pm
It doesn't matter because Steele will never head the RNC. First of all, there's no way the racist crackers that permeate the Repugnantcan Party are going to listen to a black man trying to tell them what they need to do. Second of all, even Repugs know a stale Oreo loser when they see one.
Support the Troops.
End the Occupation.
- Email this page
By Guy FawkesNovember 17, 2008 - 9:20pmBy Guy FawkesNovember 17, 2008 - 9:20pm
LMAO
hatey wants another ass kicking on southern politics again. But it's more fun ignoring him.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 17, 2008 - 9:30pmIt looks like the felon lost
Stevens will no longer be senator from Alaska.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 10:23amArizona Congressman Renzi Has Charges Added
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 10:25amVery intuitive article.
There is a lot of whites reacting in heartbreaking negative ways. They also have a transition to make. First the outrage, then the quiet depression and finally the acceptance? THEN we will have a changed world. It's going to be beautiful.
- Email this page
By samba333November 16, 2008 - 12:59pmChambliss Refusing to Speak in Imperial Sugar Case
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 5:12pmRoundup of daily violence - Sunday 16 November 2008
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 5:15pmSaturday: 4 US GIs, 16 Iraqis Killed; 75 Iraqis Wounded
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 5:17pmBush will pardon those who tortured for him
Now we will know the names.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 5:18pmRussia seeking to purchase Israeli-made spy planes
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 5:39pmIran detains 10 spies near Pakistan border-TV says
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 5:45pmThanks for keeping us informed as to how
fucked up the rest of the world is. But, I thought you where against spamming?
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 6:06pmfu bush
Yo, bamma biotch
you baked. Don't be such a jabronie. Yo just a jankity ol WB.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:59pmmomofuklansman:
Why haven't you addressed Michtou's rebuttal of your asinine assertions? You have time for this kind of foolishness, why not address her rebuttal? She just delivered the dope slap heard round the world on your big, stupid cartoon face, THAT'S why!
Bye, Dummy!
- Email this page
By othelloNovember 16, 2008 - 6:20pmI have many times, as I did today.
Try to keep up.
- Email this page
By momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 7:06pmBy momofukuNovember 16, 2008 - 5:59pm
locked to preserve the stupidity.
We need a troll romper room.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 7:39pmShias call for Basra to be mini-state
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 6:04pmWhile Bush could have been going after OBL...
In the meantime Blackwater USA shipped 900 automatic weapons to Iraq illegally. These weapons went missing. How many US troops have died because of Blackwater USA?
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 6:24pmPakistan shuts NATO supply line
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 16, 2008 - 6:30pmCan we get a romper room thread for the trolls?