You're Scaring Me, Obama: Let the Bush Years Die

Don't even get me started on your vote for the $700 billion Wall Street bailout.
I cast a ballot for you in November, but I just can't share in this moment of collective euphoria over your election.
So, if your transition team really wants feedback on "where President-Elect Obama should lead this country," here's a Top Five list:
1. Dump the Bush Doctrine and don't start more wars
You've made it clear that the US has to "take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights" and you've argued for "more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11."
What exactly does that mean?
Take troops out of Iraq and shove them into Afghanistan? Further destabilize Pakistan?
The whole idea of preemptive war (a.k.a. the Bush Doctrine) has no place in a civilized society and must be laid to rest, along with those sacrificed in Bush's military adventurism these past eight years.
Yet your approach to preemptive war, Mr. Obama, is nuanced at best.
During the January 2008 Democratic presidential debate, you said that if the US had "actionable intelligence" and Pakistan didn't "take on Al Qaida in their territory," then "I would strike." You added, " And that's the flaw of the Bush doctrine. It wasn't that he went after those who attacked America. It was that he went after those who didn't."
No, the flaw of the Bush Doctrine is that it's just plain wrong. We've learned that the hard way.
2. Ditch the warmongers
What's with all of the hawks in your new administration?
You presented yourself as a peace candidate and then chose Joe Biden as your VP. Yes, he brought in the white male vote, but he also backed the invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Just last month Biden warned that if you were elected, there would be "an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy." He said that you would make some "incredibly tough decisions" that could alienate the Democratic base, because if decisions are "popular, they're probably not sound."
In other words, a popular decision, one that the majority of the people wants, is probably not a good decision. Democracy to Biden…
And then there's Robert Gates, widely rumored to be staying on as your Defense Secretary. Questions about Gates' role in Iran-Contra, not to mention his skewing of intelligence about Russia, still linger.
But especially disturbing is his recent push for beefing up the US nuclear arsenal: "As long as other nations have or seek nuclear weapons – and can potentially threaten us, our allies and friends – then we must have a deterrent capacity that makes it clear that challenging the United States in the nuclear arena, or with weapons of mass destruction, could result in an overwhelming, catastrophic response."
Let's get this straight: if other nations are even imagined to "seek" nuclear weapons, that "could result in an overwhelming, catastrophic response" from the US.
Obama, you've often insisted on taking "no options off the table" in dealing with Iran. How does Gates' proposal for the preemptive use of nuclear weapons factor in there?
While we're on the topic of warmongers in your midst… Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff? Yet another hawk, hell-bent on Iran and enamored with nuclear weapons.
And now we've got Clinton as Secretary of State.
Why is it that none of the 23 senators and 133 House Reps who voted against the war in Iraq are even on a short-list for these critical posts?
3. Close Guantanamo – and the whole system of secret prisons
Shutting down Gitmo is said to be a priority for your new administration. Terrific.
But what about Bagram? What about the other CIA "black site" secret prisons set up in Afghanistan, Thailand, Eastern Europe and elsewhere? What about the CIA torture flights? Will those end too?
Closing Gitmo also raises questions over how "high value" defendants will be handled. Your administration is reportedly considering setting up an alternative court system to deal with sensitive cases. But what safeguards will be in place to be sure that this new system won't degenerate into kangaroo courts, like Bush's military commissions?
It's a disturbing signal that you've appointed John Brennan, who has supported extraordinary rendition and warrantless wiretapping, to help review intelligence agencies for your administration. As former CIA and State Department analyst Mel Goodman noted, Brennan "sat there at [former CIA Director George] Tenet's knee when they passed judgment on torture and abuse, on extraordinary renditions, on black sites, on secret prisons. He was part of all of that decision making."
And this is who will help lead us out of this mess?
You've criticized the use of torture, yet reportedly will not bring criminal charges against those who authorized or conducted torture during the Bush years. Your administration doesn't see it as politically expedient, and Bush might give "preemptive" pardons anyway.
But can we really end this dark chapter in our nation's history without even an investigation? A Truth Commission, perhaps? Providing blanket immunity to all low-level and senior government officials won't prevent possible war crimes from happening again. Quite the opposite.
4. Expose Bush & Co., and ditch the national surveillance state
Speaking of war crimes, how about Bush, Cheney and the rest? You'll soon be given access to Bush-era secret orders and opinions authorizing everything from surveillance to detention. You'll no doubt rescind many, to great fanfare, but what about sharing this evidence of Bush-year excesses with the public?
Yes, Bush could file a lawsuit and invoke executive privilege, but it's worth the fight. The only other option is shielding Bush & Co., similar to how you will reportedly shield those government officials involved in torture. But the public deserves to know. And if Bush administration officials violated the law, they should be prosecuted.
Now, back to your vote for both the PATRIOT Act reauthorization in 2006 and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act amendment in 2008. These and other rollbacks in domestic civil liberties under Bush are inexcusable and must be addressed. We'll be waiting for you to do that.
5. Choose Main Street (not Wall Street)
Just this month you promised Americans that they can "turn the page on policies that have put the greed and irresponsibility of Wall Street before the hard work and sacrifice of folks on Main Street."
Yet, as Bloomberg notes, "almost half the people" on your Transition Economic Advisory Board "have held fiduciary positions at companies that, to one degree or another, either fried their financial statements, helped send the world into an economic tailspin, or both."
This includes, for example, Anne Mulcahy and Richard Parsons, both of whom were Fannie Mae directors when the company fudged accounting rules. Ditto for another of your team members, William Daley.
Mulcahy and Parsons additionally held executive posts when their companies (Xerox Corp. and Time Warner Inc., respectively) got busted for accounting fraud by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Also on your team is Richard Rubin, who as Bloomberg notes, was "chairman of Citigroup Inc.'s executive committee when the bank pushed bogus analyst research, helped Enron Corp. cook its books, and got caught baking its own. He was a director from 2000 to 2006 at Ford Motor Co., which also committed accounting fouls and now is begging Uncle Sam for Citigroup-style bailout cash."
The list of questionable appointees to your Transitional Economic Advisory Board goes on and on, begging the question: Is this really the best you could come up with? How about Joseph Stiglitz, Sheila Bair, Nouriel Roubini or James K. Galbraith, for starters? Someone who represents labor?
Meanwhile, we're stuck with this nasty bailout bill – which you voted for.
Others, such as Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI), realized the bill's problems and voted against it. Feingold said that the Wall Street bailout legislation, "fails to reform the flawed regulatory structure that permitted this crisis to arise in the first place. And it doesn't do enough to address the root cause of the credit market collapse, namely the housing crisis. Taxpayers deserve a plan that puts their concerns ahead of those who got us into this mess."
Feingold was right.
In short, Mr. President-elect, you promised "Change we can believe in," but across the board it's looking a lot more like "Business as usual."
Crosspost via CommonDreams
- FILED UNDER: Guest Blogger, Afghanistan, Bush, Bush Doctrine, Clinton, FISA, Gitmo, Guantanamo, Iraq, Military, Obama, Patriot Act, war
- November 22, 2008








bakashah!
"We want the world and we want it...
Now.
Now?
NOW!"
As for me: I'm willing to wait for at least the FRist! year to pass judgment.
____________________
The scream of the butterfly...
- Email this page
By SJerseyIndyNovember 22, 2008 - 4:25pmI'll give you six months
till you bail and start attacking Obama. You will hate the new Clinton/DLC govt. Boy did they fool you!!!
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000November 22, 2008 - 5:32pmHoly smokes Huff
You really are a troll.
Let's impeach the president for lying-Neil Young
- Email this page
By bill-clinton69November 22, 2008 - 5:41pmNo, not a troll
a liberal Dem. All I said is that the libtards will be jumping ship shortly. I dont know how you figured I was a troll from me speaking the truth. I am a loyal Dem and will support Obama till he is no longer president. A troll or a libtard could not say that.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000November 22, 2008 - 7:45pmYou've always talked funny like that Huff
But it takes all kinds to make...to make uh...to make a thing that takes all kinds.
- Email this page
By aaazzz111November 22, 2008 - 10:44pmBy huffbaggybag2000 November 22, 2008 - 7:45pm
I am a loyal Dem and will support Obama till he is no longer president. A troll or a libtard could not say that.
---------------------------
Only a "libtard" would say that. Only a retarded liberal would blanketly pronounce s/he would support Obama until he is no longer President.
Support Obama until he is no longer President, eh?
Even if he tortures people on a scale worse than Bush? Starts more wars? Etc?
Do I think he will? Probably not. But who knows? The future is uncertain.
Therein lies the problem with such a wide-ranging statement, blanketly offered by a retarded liberal. A "libtard", one might say.
It takes only a slight modification of anusleaky2000's statement...
...to see that he is but part of the problem. A left-leaning version of the Contards we slap around each day. An enemy from within. Period.
____________________
- Email this page
By SJerseyIndyNovember 25, 2008 - 11:48amSay hello to your new President, mole.
McCain/Palin '08: the also-rans.
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 22, 2008 - 5:52pmAll the right wing trolls/ moles were pushing Hillary
It was their only chance.
- Email this page
By f u bush2November 22, 2008 - 5:59pmThat's why they're all so shrill now
They're all doing their best to try and keep anyone from listening to Obama in the hopes that they can keep Obama from being effective. But Obama's beaten them to the draw by naming so many competent people to his new Cabinet, and locking active lobbyists and cronies out of the selection process.
You can almost hear the sheeple-trolls' faces getting pale.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 22, 2008 - 6:02pmWell have had a Bush or
Well have had a Bush or Clinton in the executive branch since 1980. I wonder what Chelsea or the twins will be doing in 2016?
Let's impeach the president for lying-Neil Young
- Email this page
By bill-clinton69November 22, 2008 - 6:07pm2016 preview
after Obama trounces Repug candiate Sarah Palin in 2012, Joe Biden will face Jeb Bush in 2016. The American public, tired of eight years of Dem scandals (since that's all Rush Limpdick, Sean Whineatme, and Bill O'Liely will be talking about for the next 8 years) will elect Jeb in a narrow margin election. And the whole nightmare will begin again. Dick Cheney, in his cyborg heartless body, will be selected to head the VeePee selection team and will (Su-PRIZE, su-PRISE!) select himself.
- Email this page
By blogbobNovember 23, 2008 - 1:52amGet a grip
Heather, Heather, comeback Heather! If Obama or any President elect was able to tackle your top 5 all at once he would be a miracle worker. Why don't you stop acting like you know all the answers and let this thing play out a little bit? You do realize that some of the things Obama says are probably used to get certain people on his side. I think the guy is pretty damn smart. Let's give him a shot and stop acting like the sky is falling.
- Email this page
By AlderanNovember 22, 2008 - 8:11pmHeather, remember the old
Heather, remember the old adage: keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Take a deep breath and stop fearing shadows. Fear is only useful if you actually have a good reason to fear.
- Email this page
By MichtouNovember 22, 2008 - 9:09pmWhile I agree that the Bush Doctrine needs to be laid to rest...
Just because someone says it's so, doesn't make it so.
"Preemptive War" IS NOT the Bush Doctrine; "Preventive War" is. Bush and his neo-CON cronies were successful salesmen in selling preventive war to the Ameican public as preemptive war.
Using the term "Preemptive War" to describe the Bush Doctine (as stated in The National Security Strategy of the United States, September 2002) only serves to perpetuate the LIES. (Thus you are actually helping Bush.) Saddam Hussein didn't possess WMD, thus there was no war to "preempt." The "sale," was to scare the public into believing that there was a threat.
I actually wouldn't have a problem with real "preemptive war," if there actually was an immediate threat looming, but I do have a problem with preventive war (i.e. attacking another nation before they even have the capacity to become a threat).
It didn't work for Nazi Germany in 1941-45 against the Soviet Union (Hitler was worried about a stronger Red Army in 1944), and it hasn't worked for us in Iraq (2003-present).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With regards to your concerns, I, like most others here, am willing to let President Obama lead before I pass judgement on his administration. If we still have a large presence in Iraq at the end of 2010, I will voice my disapproval then.
Regarding Afghanistan, I also share concerns. The new administration needs to be careful that we don't just move one Charlie Foxtrot (Iraq) into another. I have no problem fighting Al Qaeda and the Taliban in the mountains, but if we bomb areas with large concentrations of civilians, causing needless death and suffering, we will not only lose the chance to win hearts and minds, it will actually prove counterproductive by aiding recruitment for our enemies. Afghanistan, with its history of tribal factions, is not an easy country to conquer; one only needs to look at the previous attempsts made by Alexander the Great (the greatest military mind in the history of the world), the British, and the Soviet Union. I know that Obama doesn't talk to dead people, but maybe Nancy could give Alex a call; at the least, Obama should call some old Soviet generals and ask them for some Monday morning quarterbacking.
I've been sceptical of his decision to appoint Clinton as Secretary of State, because she opposed Obama on foreign policy during the campaign, but if she is a team player and executes President Obama's policies, then it will be a good choice.
So far, it looks like President-elect Obama is more concerned with competence, rather than ideology (as opposed to Bush). This IS change I can believe in!
- Email this page
By ExpatinEUNovember 23, 2008 - 7:08amI voted for Obama because he would bring back
the status quo and keep another dangerous right- wing radical out of the White House.
The push for the changes we want will come from the citizens, not the politicians.
Leaders only make changes when pressured from their constitiuents. FDR, JFK, JBJ, etc. didn't wave a magic wand and give the people the things they needed. The people forced them to.
- Email this page
By thaelmann37November 23, 2008 - 12:49pmHeather is right on......
On every point, you are on the money. Oops....oh, the money. The looting and pillaging of the American people is taking place in front of our eyes. But, a couple points to add....
We are distinctly being excluded from representation necessary for our voices to be heard and changes made for the country, in a successful direction. Robert Gates, Offensive Secretary, as there is no policy of defense left anymore, knows quite a bit about Iran-Contra and Policies of using assets to fund operations kept secret from the public. And then there was his retirement from the Agency, and he wound up eventually working with Jack Abramoff - at arms length or mutually supportive on the Electronic Voting Machines HAVA debacle of 2002. His home court in his home state (San Juan County, Washington) has some great comments on how he influences Election laws (See Washblog, "King County Trims Reckless Plan": ttp://www.washblog.com/story/2007/9/18/19326/6168 & http://www.blackboxvoting.org/, See 9-19-08: Construction workers discover their secret ballot invaded "My Ballot is none of your business."). Or elections period. Then there's the little background info he's in on with Dick Cheney and the 9/11 time frame.
Oh, there's that little pesky issue of LSC's. You know the heavily registered and for licensed use only of Linear Shaped Charges, used around that time frame of 9/11. Those are well documented. You know who uses them and when and on what "demolition jobs." These explosives were invented by NASA to separate rocket stages and can cut steel beams and girders like butter. For Building demolitions. They are majorly controlled items. A simple Audit needs to be forthcoming and immediately seize all of those records on LSC's leading up to September 11th, 2001. These are government controlled explosive items. And an Independent Investigator is the only valid way to do that. Anything else is a sham. So, the backdraft and the consistent direction that Robert Gates leans towards is not in keeping with any of Obama's public statements. My Suggestion, my very best suggestion to Obama, is to remember with absolutely clarity Allen Welsh Dulles and his rabid position on communism, where he was more willing to kill/sacrifice his own people to perpetuate conflict than to resolve it, use diplomacy or reveal any of his aggenda to the American People (The Bay of Pig's). Gates fawning of cooking the books for political gain, slanting the NIE's, to favor or feed his handlers what they want to hear is the very clue and fingerprint of more of the same.
Allen Welsh Dulles.
This Cabinet is not shaping up well. Heather is on the money and all of us have been robbed, mugged, pillaged, raped and looted by this administration now exiting. There's nothing to stop the New Administration from doing more of the same, except us. Oh, and they can do it right in front of our faces just like the last crew did with all these talking heads that are spineless and unwilling to bring a modicum of Justice forward. These talking heads are the witnesses to crimes, like the Kitty Genovese crime, and just refuse to do the right thing. They bury their collective heads in the sand. Ostriches. We all suffer for these shills. Where we are now in history is the acquiesing to a stinking paycheck instead of the truth, and everything collapses. No magical answers here when only five individuals control the entire world's news. No wonder.
Maybe an Item #6???
And then there is the complete disconnect between Healthcare and the Tax System. 1.8 million folks go bankrupt each year. Half of them due to medical reasons. Don't you know that IRS/Taxes significantly contributed to them losing everything, including their lives. So, other countries have that Flat Tax, VAT, Fair Tax thing all figured out, but we've left it up to the crooks that got us to this point. This is stupid to rely on the morons that run the current system. They just suck in those that want to change it, like Hillary, and destroy their crediblity forever in managing to change anything. The country is bankrupt, get over it. Listening to all those that got us to this point is insane. 82% of Americans think the IRS is broken, too. They just crammed their crap down our throats for years. Everyone needs to know a million Tax Code items. Uhhuh. What do we do, bail them out? They've never done that for anyone I know of. Main Street has rolled up and blown away. Mission accomplished.
So, this might be Point #6.
- Email this page
By FBuckleyNovember 24, 2008 - 1:34amTax Codes under a Flat Tax System
You wrote: "Everyone needs to know a million Tax Code items. "
And how in the heck are you going to define income under a flat tax system? Do you think everyone is an employee who gets a W-2 at the end of the year stating what their income is?
I'll restate this for you: as long as income is taxed, income must be defined and the way to define it is through a tax code.
- Email this page
By houndmommaNovember 24, 2008 - 1:14pmNever call it "raising taxes" on the super-rich
It would be wrong to let the super-rich delude themselves into believing that they owned something that they recently stole.
Don't over-tax the super-rich----hunt them down and butcher them unmercifully in their offshore haven ratnests----but don't raise their taxes.
- Email this page
By aaazzz111November 24, 2008 - 6:51amIt really is funny to see
It really is funny to see how you lefty losers continue to kiss the ass of the master of "change" when the only thing he appears to be changing in Washington is the partial skin pigment of the president's face. You fools bought into all the bullshit of "change" and never asked "to what" or "from what". Realize that a politician is a fucking politician whose main objective, once elected, is to get re-elected. Don't worry, you'll get your liberal agenda for 3 1/2 years. Just enough time to severely damage our country but not totally destroy it. Two years of defraudocrat Congress has brought the housing market to it's knees and now the mere thought of a liberal Executive Branch to go along with the morons in Congress, Reid and Pelosi, and the stock market crashes even further in a seeminglt never-ending freefall. It appears our only blocking point in Congress from total destruction will come from my very own state of Georgia with a dumbass by the name of Saxby Chambliss, who is only slightly better that that liberal waste of human flesh he is running against in Jim Martin.
Where in hell is Newt gingrich when you need him.
- Email this page
By bebeholmesNovember 24, 2008 - 2:37pmNewt Gingrich is probably committing adultery somewhere
and scheming to replace his old wife with a new model. He is practicing "conservative" family values. We voted for and got BIG change as you right wing nuts have no power now and we will soon have a liberal supreme court. The housing crisis was caused by Republicans and 30 years of failed "conservative" economic policies.
You really need to renounce the demons you worship and become a christian. Jesus is the only way that you can hope to stop your evil lying ways before it is too late.
- Email this page
By hufflarry2000November 24, 2008 - 2:46pmHuh?
Did you say something?
*looks again*
Nope. You didn't say anything.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error. ~~~John Kenneth Galbraith
- Email this page
By nonexistent manNovember 24, 2008 - 2:49pmYou should take your act on the road, because you are
absolutely hilarious! It's amazing how the democrats were able to destroy the housing market and Wall Street in less than two years, especially when you and trolls like you were cackling about how Reid and Pelosi were never able to get any bills passed in that time. So, what is is Sparky? Were they able to do all this destruction using mind control? It certainly wasn't through any legislation that was passed.
Would you happen to remember who controlled the White House for the past 8 years? Or congress from 1994-2006? That's right, it was your beloved repubs. Were they responsible for anything during that time, or are you going to play the tired old game of blaming Clinton for everything bad? The public has wised up to that game big time, which is why repubs have been decimated in the past two elections. Fortunately, they seem too stupid to figure out why they keep getting obliterated, which means they will become a smaller and more insignificant bunch of ignorant losers for every election cycle, until they either wise up or wither away and die off.
Last I heard, Newt was busy scoping out another aide to screw, so he can dump the latest young thing he committed adultery with and married. You guys sure know how to pick the worst of the hypocrites. No wonder voters don't take you seriously any more.
Truth is whatever you can get other people to believe - Tom Smothers
- Email this page
By UffdaguyNovember 24, 2008 - 3:45pmBy beenexposedasaracist November 24, 2008 - 2:37pm
...the only thing he appears to be changing in Washington is the partial skin pigment of the president's face. ... Don't worry, you'll get your liberal agenda for 3 1/2 years.
---------------------
But, how are we gonna get our liberal agenda when we're not getting any change?
Boy, you seem to get dumber during the course of your posts.
Maybe you should stick to one-word posts.
Or, stop posting.
____________________
Crazy, Crazy Cracker... king of the white frontier...
- Email this page
By SJerseyIndyNovember 25, 2008 - 11:57amHeather....
....nice rant to start this tread.
1) Can we wait until President Elect Obama is actually residing in the WH before we state that it's going to be "Business as usual"?
2) I don't care that some of his appointees worked for Clinton/Bush ect....the president sets the agenda...period.
3) Rome wasn't built in a day and the Bush hangover is going to take some time and a few bottles of excedrin or whatever. It's going to take time to fix this mess....
Guy hasn't even taken office yet.....give it a rest. At least until....March maybe? Or is that asking too much before the bitch session begins...
- Email this page
By SgtDNovember 24, 2008 - 4:30pmBy SgtD November 24, 2008 - 4:30pm
...before the bitch session begins...
---------------------
Too late. Train's already left the station...
____________________
Drivin' that train, high on complaint...
- Email this page
By SJerseyIndyNovember 25, 2008 - 11:51am