I don't believe in God or a God(maybe many Gods if you go the comic book route and consider lesser Gods, Godlings and Demons as superior beings of monsterous or superhuman proportion and ability) cause I'd as soon believe in the Greek Gods if I were to have any God. So as argued by those asked "what was before God or a God?", God is such that God can't be understood and is timeless and always was or whatever, nothing was before God or some cockamaimee thing of the like. I understand that anything that was or were or was or were to be will be un-understanable. But the reason the arguement falls short and shy of legitamacy is if so one was to find an indeterminable un-understanble omnipotence in exhistence at all, one could expliainit's own uninunderstandability if one was so omnipotent or would if one could or explain why one cant if it couldnt, thats although as a fundemental rule and principle I understand that it is in and un-understandable, I don't understand the inability to understand why would such an event be un or inunderstadable why the precedenting subject would be in or un-understandble. One would think if there was a God there would be this point of "Its God thats magic, what it is and the only that is" but no. All you get is irreverent incoherent cop outs.

That one goes out to anyone who can get it. If you can read it... this thing or ad hangs down in front of the last two or three blogs. Its covering up the last posts. Garshk!.